Free Cecily!

On Monday, May 5, Occupy Wall Street protester Cecily McMillan was found guilty of assaulting NYPD Officer Grantley Bovell at the OWS anniversary protest on March 17, 2012. She now faces two to seven years in prison, with the possibility of probation. To tell McMillan's story and assess its consequences, a group of editors revived the Occupy! gazette in anticipation of her May 19 sentencing. Our hope is to enter into evidence what the court ignored.

A gazette revival

The Free Cecily! Gazette

On Monday, May 5, Occupy Wall Street protester Cecily McMillan was found guilty of assaulting NYPD Officer Grantley Bovell at the OWS anniversary protest on March 17, 2012. She now faces two to seven years in prison, with the possibility of probation.

The conviction was a terrible failure of justice. Abundant evidence of McMillan’s abuse at the hands of police—photos of bruises on her breast and arms, testimony that she suffered a seizure once handcuffed—was questioned in the spirit of what we’ve come to call rape culture: maybe, the prosecutor suggested, she faked it. Maybe she inflicted the bruises herself. Reports of NYPD misconduct during the Occupy protests were deemed inadmissible as evidence in court, as were the more violent parts of Officer Bovell’s record. In the absence of substantive background, the jurors came to their verdict based on a grainy video.

Upon hearing the terms of sentencing—which were, somehow, unknown to members of the jury—Charles Woodward (Juror #2) wrote a letter on behalf of nine of the twelve jurors asking Judge Zweibel for leniency in sentencing. They expressed remorse. One anonymous juror told Jon Swaine of the Guardian, “‘Most just wanted her to do probation, maybe some community service. But now what I’m hearing is seven years in jail? That’s ludicrous. Even a year in jail is ridiculous.'”

To tell McMillan’s story and assess its consequences, a group of editors revived the Occupy! gazette in anticipation of her May 19 sentencing. Our hope is to enter into evidence what the court ignored. Any meaningful conversation about McMillan must address the nationwide trend of suppressing protest, the NYPD’s ongoing assault on communities of color, the justice system’s failure to investigate wrongdoing by the police, and the disturbing tendency of well-meaning people to disbelieve women’s testimony in cases of sexual assault. As Sarah Jaffe wrote in In These Times, excerpted in this gazette, “Cecily McMillan’s case can’t just be about her,” and it isn’t.

—the gazette editors

Download the PDF here

Hard copies available for distribution in the New York area. More information can be found at justiceforcecily.com.

If you like this article, please subscribe to n+1.

Related Articles

June 22, 2010

So it was quite obvious to professionals that this guy was a fraud. But the source of the fraud, there was some disagreement.

October 13, 2011

The right to public assembly is not a right to assemble for a second, or an hour, or a day.

August 23, 2005

The right hoodwinks voters into voting on “values,” and so these voters, misjudging their interests, choose religion.

January 23, 2013

We will create change because we’re not just disaffected hippies. We’re the disaffected middle class. And we’re huge.

More by this Author

Issue 16 Double Bind

Art mostly expresses class and status hierarchies, and only secondarily might have snippets of aesthetic value.

Issue 30 Motherland

The best way to ensure the future of literary criticism is to address the problem of economic inequality.

January 13, 2009

You just find you’re standing athwart History, and History’s like, “I want to review the Susan Sontag diaries.”

December 1, 2015
The Objective Holiday Gift Guide